# Mountain and Complex Terrain

## Mountain and Complex Terrain Propagation

Mountain and highly variable terrain introduces propagation challenges - and opportunities - that differ fundamentally from flat-land or urban planning. Terrain masking is the dominant factor, but ridge placement can turn a liability into an asset.

### Terrain Masking

Terrain masking is the most significant propagation factor in mountains. When terrain lies between the transmitter and receiver, path loss increases dramatically - **diffraction over ridges adds 10 - 30+ dB** compared to free-space loss at the same distance.

Before planning a mountain link, verify line-of-sight using a terrain profile tool (HeyWhatsThat, Radio Mobile, or SPLAT!). If the path crosses terrain, budget for the additional diffraction loss.

### Knife-Edge Diffraction

When a signal diffracts over a sharp ridge, it bends into the shadow zone on the far side. This diffraction is calculable using **Fresnel zone analysis** - the geometry of the ridge height relative to the first Fresnel zone determines how much loss (or occasionally gain) results.

Tools like Radio Mobile model knife-edge diffraction accurately. A sharp, isolated ridge causes less diffraction loss than a broad rounded hill, which blocks a larger portion of the Fresnel zone.

### Ridge-Mounted Repeaters

A repeater placed on a ridgeline provides coverage to **both** the illuminated side and the shadow side of the ridge simultaneously.

This is the key insight for mountain mesh design: **place repeaters on ridges, not in valleys.** A valley node can communicate well within the valley, but a ridgeline node covers the entire valley plus the next valley over, multiplying coverage dramatically per node.

### Valley Isolation

Nodes in valleys can communicate well within the valley but are effectively isolated from nodes in adjacent valleys without a ridge or mountain repeater bridging them. This creates natural "valley clusters" in mountain mesh networks - each valley segment is connected internally but disconnected from neighbors unless ridge nodes exist.

Planning a mountain mesh means identifying which valleys need coverage, then finding the ridgelines that can serve multiple valleys with a single node.

### Elevation vs. Range (Rule of Thumb)

At approximately 45°N latitude, for an antenna at height *h* meters above local terrain:

> **Radio horizon distance ≈ 4.1 × √h km**

<table id="bkmrk-height-above-valley-"><thead><tr><th>Height Above Valley Floor</th><th>Radio Horizon</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>10 m</td><td>~13 km</td></tr><tr><td>50 m</td><td>~29 km</td></tr><tr><td>200 m</td><td>~58 km</td></tr><tr><td>500 m</td><td>~92 km</td></tr></tbody></table>

A repeater at 200 m above the valley floor sees a radio horizon of approximately 58 km - potentially covering an entire mountain region from a single node.

### Emergency Drone / Hilltop Mesh Extension

Some communities deploy temporary mesh nodes on hilltops via drones during emergencies to bridge isolated valleys. The same capability works for large outdoor events in terrain-constrained areas. A drone-carried LoRa node at 100 - 200 m AGL can bridge two otherwise-isolated valleys for the duration of its battery, providing emergency communications coverage without requiring permanent infrastructure.

Portable battery-powered repeater kits carried to hilltops on foot are another practical approach for planned events or disaster response.

### Snow Effects on Antennas

Snow has low RF absorption at 915 MHz and does not significantly affect propagation. However, **heavy wet snow buildup on antennas can detune them**:

- Use vertically-polarized antennas with a drip point design to shed snow
- Avoid horizontal radial elements in heavy-snow environments
- Wet snow accumulation on a horizontal radial can shift resonant frequency measurably, reducing antenna efficiency and SWR

For high-altitude winter deployments, sleeved dipoles and verticals with a tapered/drip-capable profile outperform flat-panel or horizontal-element designs.