RF Propagation Planning Tools

Several free tools can help you model coverage and plan repeater placement before deploying hardware. Using these tools can save wasted trips and help you choose between candidate sites.

HeyWhatsThat (heywhatsthat.com)

The fastest tool for estimating radio horizon from a specific point.

Enter a location (address, coordinates, or click on map)
Set the antenna height
Get a visualization of the radio horizon: which areas have line-of-sight from that point

How to use for repeater site selection:

Go to heywhatsthat.com
Click on your candidate repeater site on the map
Set height to your intended antenna mounting height
Click “Submit” and examine the color-coded visibility map
Compare multiple candidate sites by opening each in a new tab

Limitations: HeyWhatsThat uses terrain elevation data (SRTM) but does not include buildings or vegetation. Actual coverage will be lower than predicted in areas with tall buildings or forest.

Radio Mobile Online (radiomobile.ca)

More sophisticated link analysis tool with full path profile and link budget integration.

Enter transmitter and receiver coordinates, heights, antenna gain, TX power, and frequency
Generates a path profile showing terrain elevation along the path
Calculates predicted received signal level
Shows Fresnel zone clearance along the path

Radio Mobile is best for detailed analysis of specific point-to-point paths, not area coverage visualization.

CloudRF (cloudrf.com)

Professional-grade coverage prediction with a free tier. Features:

SRTM + LIDAR terrain data (more accurate than basic tools)
Can include clutter data (buildings, vegetation) for urban environments
Overlay predicted coverage on Google Maps or OpenStreetMap
Free tier: limited calculations per month; paid plans for heavy use

Best for: precise coverage maps for presentations, permitting, or professional deployments. Overkill for casual site selection.

Splat! (free, offline)

Open-source RF propagation tool that runs locally on Linux/Mac. Uses SRTM terrain data.

# Install on Debian/Ubuntu
sudo apt install splat

# Download SRTM data for your region from usgs.gov
# Generate coverage map
splat -t transmitter.qth -r receiver.qth -f 915 -erp 0.5 -d /path/to/srtm/data

Splat! is overkill for most community mesh deployments but valuable when building professional-grade coverage documentation or integrating with GIS workflows.

Practical planning workflow

For most community mesh network planning, this workflow is sufficient:

Identify candidate sites
Use topographic maps (USGS topo viewer, CalTopo) to identify hilltops, ridgelines, water towers, and tall buildings in your coverage area.
Quick horizon check
For each candidate site, run HeyWhatsThat at the proposed antenna height. Immediately discard sites with poor visibility to your target coverage area.
Link budget for remaining candidates
For the 2–3 best candidates, calculate link budgets to your target coverage area edges (farthest points). Compare margin values.
On-site test before permanent install
Set up a temporary antenna and node at the candidate site. Walk/drive your coverage area while monitoring RSSI/SNR. Real-world testing always beats prediction tools.
Document the result
Record the actual coverage performance after deployment. This data helps plan future expansion nodes.

Interpreting RSSI and SNR from field tests

RSSI	SNR	Link quality assessment
>−90 dBm	>+10 dB	Excellent — reliable at all data rates
−90 to −105 dBm	+5 to +10 dB	Good — reliable for all normal use
−105 to −115 dBm	0 to +5 dB	Marginal — may see occasional packet loss
−115 to −120 dBm	−5 to 0 dB	Weak — intermittent; not suitable for infrastructure
<−120 dBm	<−5 dB	Very weak — expect frequent failure

Key insight: SNR matters more than RSSI for LoRa. A signal at −125 dBm with +5 dB SNR is more reliable than one at −100 dBm with −5 dB SNR (which is being swamped by noise). When diagnosing a marginal link, prioritize improving SNR over increasing RSSI.